Lovecraft is Missing: the animated series
Need to start off with a couple of thank yous this week: first to Tony Johnson, for taking on some of the coloring chores for this week and next. With his own business, two kids and another on the way, and his own creative visions, he has no time to be wasting on somebody elseΓÇÖs web comic, but does it anyway. ThatΓÇÖs a pal. And then thereΓÇÖs Sam Gafford, one of LIMΓÇÖs earliest readers but whom I have never met, who took some pictures of St. JohnΓÇÖs for me to use as reference on this weekΓÇÖs strip. Sure, he was already in Providence for other reasons, but he didnΓÇÖt have to go out of his way to take pictures for a web comic. I appreciate that.
Over to the left is a button saying TWC, and if you click on it, you vote for LIM on Top Web Comics. Readership is growing, and getting noticed on the various web comic ranking site will help bring the strip to the attention of those who haven’t discovered us yet.
I was going to save the LIM animated series stuff for later, but I never got around to scanning the books for the post I had planned. So, here we go….
The origins of ΓÇÿLovecraft is MissingΓÇÖ animated series is detailed on the About page, so IΓÇÖll just recap here. In 1997, Film RomanΓÇÖs then-Creative Exec, Ralph Sanchez, took an option on my LIM pitch. Guy Vasilovitch was the art director. The overall storyline was similar to the story I am telling here in the comic book, but since a series is basically about treading water, there were many more side trips to stretch the story out.
As happens with creative people, there were differences of opinion, and there were a few false starts on the art side, but here is what I have in my files. (I donΓÇÖt know who the artists were, but the images, unless noted differently, are all copyright 1997 by Film Roman Productions.):
This is the cover of the pitch bible, and is a composite of two other pieces. I wasnΓÇÖt crazy about the characters, and the mood seemed more reminiscent of a 1940s hard-boiled thriller, but it was the best stuff we had at the time we needed to print the book. DonΓÇÖt get me wrong, itΓÇÖs good art, just not what I had in mind.
We had the most trouble with Nan. I had an image of her, but the powers that be wanted her smarter, sexier, thus the glasses and hair. Win looks like a private investigator.
HereΓÇÖs another pass at Nan.
And my pass (Copyright 1997 by Larry Latham)
And this is the one they decided to go with for the interior of the development pitch.
In 2006, I dusted the property off, and updated Nan (copyright 2006 by Larry Latham)
Win like wise went through various versions. This one, while a good drawing, totally missed the point.
My drawing is pretty close to what IΓÇÖm using now.(Copyright 1997 by Larry Latham)
But for the pitch, they made him a bit beefier.
Again, in 2006, I updated the pitch, and Win looked like this(Copyright 2006 by Larry Latham)
Backgrounds were an issue for me. The city scenes below are too wide, too expansive, and to me, they donΓÇÖt look like Boston. For the Lovecraftian sites, they tended to be more Gothic, like something out of one of the Corman Poe pictures.
Film Roman and I went our separate ways, but they still had the option and did further work for a year before it all reverted back tome. Most of which IΓÇÖve only become aware of recently. Mike Kaluta did some presentation pieces which IΓÇÖve never seen. And a couple of years ago, Howard Chaykin sent me this xerox of a French artist who did some work and included his drawings in a collection of his work.
This last is very cool stuff and I wish I could remember the artist’s name. I’ll try to find it out.
Anyway, looking back on it, I’m glad the series didn’t go. It would have been one compromise after another. With the web comic, I can do what I want, and take the consequences. But if the web comic gets a big enough readership and somebody wants to take it back to animation…well, I’m willing to talk.

















February 2nd, 2009 at 10:31 am
Awesome stuff Larry. I really like the French artist’s title in the upper right. Very cool- you should do some of your own adaptations on that
February 4th, 2009 at 3:43 am
Ah, I see! It’s a shame it never took off as an animated series, but I think you’re right – the freedom you have with this format is going to work in your favour.
February 6th, 2009 at 9:36 am
Larry, it is indeed awesome, however I can understand why it never took off as an animated series; it would almost certainly require thinking on the behalf of the watcher unless it was to become another “new Ghostbusters” cartoon.
In this post-MTV generation people normally look to be spoon fed and the people who provide their entertainment seem only to happy to oblige.
February 7th, 2009 at 10:36 am
“… but since a series is basically about treading water, there were many more side trips to stretch the story out.”
And that’s one of the reasons I don’t have a TV anymore. Why stretch a story out when you can instead add on more story? And why dilute something that’s original rather than take full advantage of that originality in order to make it stand out against the competition? Surely anyone who’s into Lovecraft would want it to look as authentic as possible, right?
Well, maybe not. According to the ‘test for nerdity’ that a certain MightyGodKing made up, the nerdiest thing you can do when it comes to Lovecraft is to actually read his stories. More nerdy than “organizing a chapter of the Campus Crusade For Cthulhu”, and on par with “speaking fluent Klingon”. Boggles my mind. Though I’ll admit that when I read The Colour Out of Space as a kid, I wasn’t impressed. What’s so scary about a colour? And sure, many years later, when I read that one and several other stories, it was mostly because I was going to play in a Call of Cthulhu RPG campaign. So maybe MightyGodKing got it right. Maybe reading the stories actually is the final destination? Maybe in the future there could be a level of nerdity applied to watching the Lovecraft Is Missing animated series…